Active Entries
- 1: We know everything about us
- 2: Underdog stories
- 3: And the only sound is the broken sea
- 4: 'Some say this is progressive house, but we all know this is progressive home'
- 5: Friday open thread: douze points
- 6: All in the blue unclouded weather
- 7: The blades of green, green grass
- 8: The light on the hill burns bright
- 9: One final Australian politics link for now
- 10: Short Saturday linkpost
Style Credit
- Style: Bold Dances for Dusty Foot by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2013-10-26 10:06 am (UTC)we think of art as this free, liberating medium when really at one time you had to make sure nothing could be interpreted as treason against the King.
That is very true, although in medieval Ireland, poets could threaten to compose a satire about rulers with whom they were dissatisfied, and the threat of this was apparently so grave that the rulers tended to pay the poets in order to prevent the satires being composed. (The idea was that the satire would shame the ruler.) It's not clear how much this reflects historical realities - it may just be a sort of literary trope, but it does seem to point to a certain ambiguity in terms of power relations between artists and rulers in medieval Ireland at least.