Switching on that light on the hill
May. 26th, 2022 05:29 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I was going to wait until the dust had settled slightly — at least until we knew the full shape of the results, but counting continues. As of this evening (26th May), we still don't know if we're going to have a Labor government with a slim majority, or a minority Labor-led government with some form of coalition or confidence-and-supply agreement with independents and minor parties. The former is more likely, but any result is honestly fine by me.
Some context for non-Australians, before I launch into my thoughts on the results.
Australia has compulsory voting (technically, compulsory to show up at a polling station or send in a postal vote envelope — obviously voting is secret, so no one can see if you actually vote or not); if you do not vote without a good mitigating reason you get a small fine. As a result, turnout is very high — always more than 90 per cent, usually more than 95 per cent — and the entire electoral infrastructure is very well organised. Voter suppression is impossible, and elections cannot be won by appealing to a narrow base and assuming apathy will keep most citizens away from the polls. We have serious problems with the Murdoch press, and elections have been won on single issue rightwing culture wars in the past, but in general, you have to get the centre if you want to win office. Where that 'centre' lies has shifted back and forth over the years — governments of the day tend to set the tone as to what is the 'sensible centre' — but compulsory voting is generally a shield against the worst rightwing extremism. (Australians will be arguing with me here: our past government was awful. But they only had a majority of one seat, and although their rhetoric was awful and their inaction in certain areas was a disgrace, it could have been a lot worse.)
In addition to compulsory voting, we have preferential (ranked choice voting), meaning it is impossible to waste your vote, and tactical voting is generally unecessary. (About as tactical as it gets is putting your unrealistic preferred candidate first, and then ranking the candidate you can tolerate second.) In addition to this, we have an independent electoral commission responsible for drawing electoral boundaries (no gerrymandering), and electorates are based solely on population — roughly 105,000 people per electorate — so a tiny, densely populated area in inner city Sydney counts as much as a huge expanse of the outback in the Northern Territory. Most Australians live in cities, so you have to win a lot of city votes to win.
Our two main political parties are the Australian Labor Party (ALP), centre-left social democratic party, and the Liberal Party, centre-right party. The latter always contests elections as a coalition with the conservative National Party — the Nationals stand candidates in rural areas, and the Liberals in cities, towns and suburban areas. We also have various minor parties — the Greens are the biggest — and this year a group of 'teal independents' contested a bunch of seats in wealthy parts of major cities, on a platform of 'doing something about climate change.' These are places which tend to vote Liberal, but whose voters have progressive attitudes when it comes to social issues and were alienated by the Liberal Party's tilt to the far right, its embrace of rightwing culture war issues, and its refusal to do anything to combat climate change. (Full disclosure: my dad was the paid campaign strategist for the teals' campaigns.)
We were coming into this election after nearly ten years of rightwing Coalition government, and I didn't know what to expect. I'm so battered and weary after the past decade of ongoing political horrors all around the world that I just assumed the worst would come to pass: another term of Coalition government, Scott Morrison rewarded for his cruelty, his arrogance, his incompetence, and his evangelical Christianity prosperity gospel nonsense that is so out of step with highly secular, irreligious Australia. I assumed that this election would be like all others: confirming that I lived in a leftwing bubble, that the feelings of my entire family and social circle weren't echoed around the country as a whole. I settled in to watch the ABC's election coverage with a sense of trepidation and dread.
And then ... it didn't happen. The votes rolled in, and the appetite for change was enormous, all across the nation. This manifested itself in different ways in different electorates. Labor held seats in working class suburban areas that Morrison had attempted to take by stoking transphobic culture wars. Labor gained seats in Victoria and Western Australia, apparently a backlash against the Coalition federal government insulting their (Labor) state governments' attempts to fight the pandemic with strict lockdowns and border closures. The Greens — the Greens?!?!?! — gained seats in Queensland! And as for the climate change-fighting teals? They romped home in a number of formerly safe Liberal seats in various major cities. For the first time in my life, I felt that our preferential (ranked choice) voting system was working as intended: instead of a two-horse race between the two major parties, we ended up with a properly pluralistic set of results, with a record number of minor parties and independents set to take seats in parliament.
Climate change obviously loomed large as the decisive issue this election, and I welcome that, as it's been a hugely damaging, divisive wound in Australian politics since the late 2000s. But it also felt as if the election, rather than being a national affair, was about lots of individual state-level and local issues, with results reflecting attitudes to those issues as much as broader national concerns.
What was resoundingly, delightfully clear, of course, was that the country has had enough of Scott Morrison as prime minister, and his toxic, misogynistic, coal-fondling, racist, cruel-for-the-sake-of-cruelty anti-refugee, victim blaming prosperity gospel garbage government. And our votes reflected that. It is so, so, so satisfying to see, like being washed clean by the sea of all the metaphorical dirt and grime and blood of the past nine years.
I'm a cautious and pessimistic person by nature — out of a sense of self-preservation, to be honest — so I do have some cause for concern in the wake of this result (in essence: when centre left parties lose elections, there's a lot of ugly soul searching, usually a circular firing squad, and they try to work out how they should change, but when right wing parties lose elections, their reaction tends to be 'Are we out of touch? No, it's the voters who are wrong' and double down on moving further to the right). But for the moment, right now, they're all pushed aside, and I feel as if I can breathe for the first time in years.
We did it. The evil is defeated, and, even if only for a little while, we can feel hope again.
I'll conclude with some links that really sum up this election:
Two articles by journalist Annabel Crabb summing up the election result.
This amazing First Dog on the Moon cartoon.
Meanwhile In Australia: the election edition.
Some context for non-Australians, before I launch into my thoughts on the results.
Australia has compulsory voting (technically, compulsory to show up at a polling station or send in a postal vote envelope — obviously voting is secret, so no one can see if you actually vote or not); if you do not vote without a good mitigating reason you get a small fine. As a result, turnout is very high — always more than 90 per cent, usually more than 95 per cent — and the entire electoral infrastructure is very well organised. Voter suppression is impossible, and elections cannot be won by appealing to a narrow base and assuming apathy will keep most citizens away from the polls. We have serious problems with the Murdoch press, and elections have been won on single issue rightwing culture wars in the past, but in general, you have to get the centre if you want to win office. Where that 'centre' lies has shifted back and forth over the years — governments of the day tend to set the tone as to what is the 'sensible centre' — but compulsory voting is generally a shield against the worst rightwing extremism. (Australians will be arguing with me here: our past government was awful. But they only had a majority of one seat, and although their rhetoric was awful and their inaction in certain areas was a disgrace, it could have been a lot worse.)
In addition to compulsory voting, we have preferential (ranked choice voting), meaning it is impossible to waste your vote, and tactical voting is generally unecessary. (About as tactical as it gets is putting your unrealistic preferred candidate first, and then ranking the candidate you can tolerate second.) In addition to this, we have an independent electoral commission responsible for drawing electoral boundaries (no gerrymandering), and electorates are based solely on population — roughly 105,000 people per electorate — so a tiny, densely populated area in inner city Sydney counts as much as a huge expanse of the outback in the Northern Territory. Most Australians live in cities, so you have to win a lot of city votes to win.
Our two main political parties are the Australian Labor Party (ALP), centre-left social democratic party, and the Liberal Party, centre-right party. The latter always contests elections as a coalition with the conservative National Party — the Nationals stand candidates in rural areas, and the Liberals in cities, towns and suburban areas. We also have various minor parties — the Greens are the biggest — and this year a group of 'teal independents' contested a bunch of seats in wealthy parts of major cities, on a platform of 'doing something about climate change.' These are places which tend to vote Liberal, but whose voters have progressive attitudes when it comes to social issues and were alienated by the Liberal Party's tilt to the far right, its embrace of rightwing culture war issues, and its refusal to do anything to combat climate change. (Full disclosure: my dad was the paid campaign strategist for the teals' campaigns.)
We were coming into this election after nearly ten years of rightwing Coalition government, and I didn't know what to expect. I'm so battered and weary after the past decade of ongoing political horrors all around the world that I just assumed the worst would come to pass: another term of Coalition government, Scott Morrison rewarded for his cruelty, his arrogance, his incompetence, and his evangelical Christianity prosperity gospel nonsense that is so out of step with highly secular, irreligious Australia. I assumed that this election would be like all others: confirming that I lived in a leftwing bubble, that the feelings of my entire family and social circle weren't echoed around the country as a whole. I settled in to watch the ABC's election coverage with a sense of trepidation and dread.
And then ... it didn't happen. The votes rolled in, and the appetite for change was enormous, all across the nation. This manifested itself in different ways in different electorates. Labor held seats in working class suburban areas that Morrison had attempted to take by stoking transphobic culture wars. Labor gained seats in Victoria and Western Australia, apparently a backlash against the Coalition federal government insulting their (Labor) state governments' attempts to fight the pandemic with strict lockdowns and border closures. The Greens — the Greens?!?!?! — gained seats in Queensland! And as for the climate change-fighting teals? They romped home in a number of formerly safe Liberal seats in various major cities. For the first time in my life, I felt that our preferential (ranked choice) voting system was working as intended: instead of a two-horse race between the two major parties, we ended up with a properly pluralistic set of results, with a record number of minor parties and independents set to take seats in parliament.
Climate change obviously loomed large as the decisive issue this election, and I welcome that, as it's been a hugely damaging, divisive wound in Australian politics since the late 2000s. But it also felt as if the election, rather than being a national affair, was about lots of individual state-level and local issues, with results reflecting attitudes to those issues as much as broader national concerns.
What was resoundingly, delightfully clear, of course, was that the country has had enough of Scott Morrison as prime minister, and his toxic, misogynistic, coal-fondling, racist, cruel-for-the-sake-of-cruelty anti-refugee, victim blaming prosperity gospel garbage government. And our votes reflected that. It is so, so, so satisfying to see, like being washed clean by the sea of all the metaphorical dirt and grime and blood of the past nine years.
I'm a cautious and pessimistic person by nature — out of a sense of self-preservation, to be honest — so I do have some cause for concern in the wake of this result (in essence: when centre left parties lose elections, there's a lot of ugly soul searching, usually a circular firing squad, and they try to work out how they should change, but when right wing parties lose elections, their reaction tends to be 'Are we out of touch? No, it's the voters who are wrong' and double down on moving further to the right). But for the moment, right now, they're all pushed aside, and I feel as if I can breathe for the first time in years.
We did it. The evil is defeated, and, even if only for a little while, we can feel hope again.
I'll conclude with some links that really sum up this election:
Two articles by journalist Annabel Crabb summing up the election result.
This amazing First Dog on the Moon cartoon.
Meanwhile In Australia: the election edition.
no subject
Date: 2022-05-26 06:15 pm (UTC)Also, thanks for explaining how voting works in Australia, I honestly had no clue about it.
no subject
Date: 2022-05-26 08:12 pm (UTC)The voting system is pretty good — the combination of ranked choice votes, compulsory voting, and independent electoral commission basically leads me to conclude that the absence of these things (I'd accept ranked choice being replaced with proportional representation, of course) means that a system is not truly democratic.
no subject
Date: 2022-05-27 07:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-05-26 08:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-05-29 02:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-05-26 08:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-05-29 02:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-05-27 01:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-05-29 02:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-05-27 02:19 am (UTC)I have seen bits and pieces about the Liberal party believing the problem is they weren't right wing enough. Time will tell if that works out for them, but I think that's yet another sign they're clueless fuckwits.
ETA also I think some of the swing against the Liberal party in Victoria is because of how a lot of people in this state felt like federal politics left us out to dry during our long lockdowns. There was a lot of bullshit about treating Victoria as a dirty, diseased place, unlike those pure clean other states that were worthy of attention, and I do not think people here will forget that for a very long time.
no subject
Date: 2022-05-29 02:28 pm (UTC)I have seen bits and pieces about the Liberal party believing the problem is they weren't right wing enough. Time will tell if that works out for them, but I think that's yet another sign they're clueless fuckwits.
I agree with you within the current electoral system. My real concern is that they'll wise up to the fact that preferential voting and compulsory voting benefit the centre-left (I know this sounds strange given that Australia tends to have Coalition governments more often than it has Labor ones, but the point is that the electoral system tends not to give Coalition governments a huge majority, and therefore they get restrained to a certain extent from doing very right-wing things). I have this dark fear that they'll campaign for the next election on a platform of abolishing compulsory and preferential voting (i.e. they'll take these things to a referendum, were they to get elected), and, with a cheerleading Murdoch press they might get away with it. Everyone I've raised this with so far has told me that I'm being hysterical and paranoid, but the problem is that I've lived in the UK for the past thirteen years, and this swing to the far-right (accompanied by various changes in legislation that make it illegal to protest, attempt to remove the independence of the judiciary, remove the independence of the UK electoral commission, and implement voter ID laws like in the US) happened so quickly and so brutally that it's now basically impossible to reverse.
I hear you re: the situation in Victoria. I remember all of that, and thought it was disgusting. There was a similar sentiment expressed towards people living in overseas countries in relation to the border closures and hotel quarantine, a smugness that Australians were so much better than everyone else at handling the pandemic, and that each individual Australian had personally done something so clever and self-sacrificing and wonderful to keep Covid out of the country, unlike all the diseased and stupid people in Europe. It really made me so angry.
no subject
Date: 2022-05-29 10:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-05-27 03:05 am (UTC)When you talk about your voting system, it honestly almost makes me cry…
no subject
Date: 2022-05-29 02:36 pm (UTC)When you talk about your voting system, it honestly almost makes me cry…
It really is a wonderful system, and it makes me so angry that other countries don't have something similar. I find it grimly hilarious that the compulsory voting was basically introduced in the early twentieth century because politicians were concerned that Australians were politically apathetic — can you imagine any contemporary politicians finding this a cause for concern?
I do feel that a lot of Australians are smugly complacent about our electoral system — we love it and thinks it's fantastic, but I think many people just assume that it will always remain. The system as it exists benefits centrism (and to a lesser extent it benefits centre-left parties), and I live in terror that the right-wingers will realise they've lost the centre, they've lost the ability to build a broad coalition of voters, and rather than trying to win back votes on the centre, they'll abolish the system in favour of something that will benefit the right-wingers convincing a small base of true believers to vote, and an apathetic majority to avoid the polls. Every Australian I've spoken with about this has so far told me that I'm being paranoid and hysterical, but my experience of the past ten years in the UK shows me that this kind of antidemocratic manipulation can happen so quickly, and so brutally, such that it is impossible to overturn.
no subject
Date: 2022-05-27 06:39 am (UTC)OMG this was Jane Hume EXACTLY. 'Liberal values are very much Australia’s values, and I don’t think that Australia understands that anymore.'
What a knucklehead. As if it's the country that's confused!
I'm watching my division's results closely, as although it will go to the ALP in the end, it's amazing to see how many first preferences were for the Greens and I hope it encourages the ALP member to take a close look at where his final votes have come from.
Have you seen the three-way split of first preferences in Macnamara? It's pretty amazing. There's going to be a lot of recounting.
no subject
Date: 2022-05-29 02:42 pm (UTC)'Are we out of touch? No, it's the voters who are wrong'
OMG this was Jane Hume EXACTLY. 'Liberal values are very much Australia’s values, and I don’t think that Australia understands that anymore.'
What a knucklehead. As if it's the country that's confused!
I saw that, and it was exactly what I was thinking of. I also saw Bronwyn Bishop calling immediately after the results came in for an end to preferential voting (to be replaced with first past the post; to which I say, as someone who has lived and voted in the UK for more than a decade, NOOOOOO!).
Those batches of results are wild, and to be honest I like to see it. What's the point of having preferential voting if people just vote ALP or Liberal/National as their first preference every time? I feel like this election was one of the first times the system actually worked as intended, with a truly pluralistic, representative parliament full of Greens and 'teals', as well as MPs from the major parties.
no subject
Date: 2022-05-27 02:26 pm (UTC)Seriously, though, I'm so so happy for you!!!
no subject
Date: 2022-05-29 02:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-05-27 06:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-05-29 02:44 pm (UTC)The electoral system in Australia is great — we're very lucky to have it.
no subject
Date: 2022-05-28 09:59 am (UTC)I'm honestly very surprised by how many Greens representatives we now have in government. (It's a good surprise—it's clear that the majority of voters want action on climate change, myself included.) I hope it's a good change and mix-up for us.
We just need to get rid of Dutton now. Can't believe someone so evil can still be in a power seat.
no subject
Date: 2022-05-29 02:47 pm (UTC)I think if Dutton becomes opposition leader it will be harder to vote him out (high profile MPs tend to get reelected), but stranger things have happened. I just hope he never, ever gets anywhere near any position of true political power again.
no subject
Date: 2022-05-28 11:58 am (UTC)❤️❤️❤️
I hope you get to see many positive changes come out of this.
no subject
Date: 2022-05-29 02:48 pm (UTC)